THE INFLUENCE OF REGENERATED LITTER ON THE PRODUCTIVE PERFORMANCE AND WELL-BEING OF REARING YOUNG CHICKENS

DOI: 10.32900/2312-8402-2023-130-191-202

Ryabinina Elena,
Ph.D., Senior Researcher,
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3803-0195
Melnyk Volodymyr,
Ph.D.,
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3571-7872
State poultry research station NAAS of Ukraine

Keywords: Litter, regeneration, multiple use, rearing chickens, microclimate, poultry welfare, zootechnical indicators


Due to the shortage and high cost of bedding materials, the regeneration of used reinforcement and its repeated use is an urgent problem in modern poultry farming. However, at the same time, there is a threat of the negative impact of such litter on poultry. Several studies have proved the possibility of raising broiler chickens on regenerated bedding. Less studied is the option of using regenerated waste in the cultivation and maintenance of poultry with a long production cycle rearing young stock or adult birds. In the State Experimental Poultry Station National Academy of Agrarian Sciences of Ukraine (SEPS NAASU), the regeneration technology of used litter has been improved. In this study, the impact of the use of litter regenerated according to the developed technology in the rearing of young chickens on the microclimate of the poultry house, well-being, and zootechnical indicators of poultry was studied. The research was carried out on the experimental farm of the SEPS NAASU. According to the results of the investigation, although the initial moisture content of the regenerated litter was higher than the new one (p<0.05), after ten weeks of rearing young animals, the litter moisture content in both variants no longer had significant differences. During the growing period, the content of ammonia and carbon dioxide in the air of the experimental premises did not exceed the maximum permissible concentrations. Still, in the practical room, it was higher than in the control room, especially in the initial cultivation period. The leading difference was 4.4 mg/m3 for ammonia and 0.05% for carbon dioxide. In terms of ammonia content, the difference between the experimental and control variants was statistically significant up to 8 weeks of age (p<0.05) and carbon dioxide content up to 6 weeks of age (p<0.05). There was no negative impact of regenerated litter on the well-being indicators (condition of feather cover, knee joints, and paw feet) and zootechnical indicators of rearing young stock (safety, body weight, and feed conversion). This indicates the possibility of using regenerated litter in the rearing of young chickens without a negative impact on poultry.

References

Abougabal, M., Taboosha, M. F. (2017). Effect of reusing litter on productive performance, carcass characteristics and behavior of broiler chickens. Int. J. Env., 6(2), P. 61 – 69.

Abougabal, M. (2019). Possibility of Broiler Production on Reused Litter. Egyptian Poultry Science Journal, 39(2), 405-421. https://doi.org/ 10.21608/epsj.2019.35039

Benedet, J.P., Perosa, F.F., Silva, I.G.,  Troncarelli, M.Z., Rauber, R.H., Gomes, T.M.A. (2021). Broiler recycled litter treatments against Clostridium perfringens and enterobacteria in conventional and dark house systems. Animal Science. Pesq. agropec. bras., Brasília, 56, e02325. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-3921.pab2021.v56.02325

Bignon, L., Mika, A., Dupin, M., Dusart, L., Travel, A. (2015). Use fiber in feed and wheat crop residues as litter to improve broiler welfare. Actes des 11emes Journees de la Recherche Avicole et Palmipedes a Foie Gras. Tours. France. P. 887 – 892. (In French).

Bucher, M.G., Zwirzitz, B., Oladeinde, A., Cook, K., Plymel, C., Zock, G., Lakin, S., E Aggrey, S., Ritz, C., Looft, T., Lipp, E.,  E Agga,  G., Abdo, Z., R Sistani, K.  (2020). Reused poultry litter microbiome with competitive exclusion potential against Salmonella Heidelberg. Journal of Environmental Quality, 49(4), 869 – 881. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeq2.20081

Coufal, C. D., Chavez, C., Niemeyer P.R. and Carey, J.B. (2006). Effects of top-dressing recycled broiler litter on litter production, litter characteristics, and nitrogen mass balance. Poultry Science. 85(3), 392-397. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/85.3.392

Cressman, M. D. (2014).  Effects of Litter Reuse on Performance, Welfare, and the Microbiome of the Litter and Gastrointestinal Tract of Commercial Broiler Chickens. DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University. 182 p.

De Jong, I. C., Moya, T. P., Gunnink, H., Heuvel, H., Hindle, V., Mul, M., Reenen, K. (2011). Simplifying the welfare quality assessment protocol for broilers. Report. №. 533. Wageningen UR Livestock Research, Lelystad, Netherlands,  1 – 61.

Dornelas, K.C., Mascarenhas, N.M., Santos da Rocha, P.A., Ton, A.P., Amaral, A. G., Schneider, R.M., Santos, A.N., Furtado, D.A., Nascimento, J.W.B. (2023). Chicken bed reuse. Envirnmental Science and Pollution Research, 30,  39537-39545. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s11356-023-25850-8

Dornelas, K.C., Mascarenhas, N.M.H., Rodrigues, H., Nascimento,  R.T. (2020).  Chicken bed: a review on reuse, treatment and influence on ambience. Poultry Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.09.067

Garces-Gudino, J., Merino-Guzman, R., Cevallos-Gordon, A.L. (2018). Litter reuse reduces Eimeria spp oocyst counts and improves the performance in broiler chickens reared in a tropical zone in Ecuador. Europ.Poult.Sci.,  82. ISSN 1612-9199, © Verlag Eugen Ulmer, Stuttgart. https://doi.org/ 10.1399/eps.2018.220

Grimes, J.L., Williams, C.M., Godwin, J.L., Smith, J.C. (2003). Heat Treatment of Turkey Litter for Reuse as Bedding. International Journal of Poultry Science,  2(5), 287-292. https://doi.org/ 10.3923/ijps.2003.287.292

Hocking, P., Mayne, R., French, N.A.,   Else, R.W. (2008). Standard european footpad dermatitis scoring system for use in turkey processing plants. Worlds Poult. Sci. J.,64,  323–328. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933908000068.

Karthiga, S. and Sharmilaa, G. (2018). Methodologies for re-use of poultry litter in broiler farms – A Review. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 9(4),  230–233.

Kalita, K.P., Saikia, R., Mahanta, J.D. (2012).  Performance of Commercial Broilers Raised on Reused and Mixed Type of Litters. Indian Journal of Hill Farming,  25(20),  33-36. Corpus ID: 55769736

Kheravii, S.K., Swick, R.A., Choct, M., Wu, S.B. (2017). Potential of pelleted wheat straw as an alternative bedding material for broilers. Poultry Science, 96(6), 1641–1647. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pew473.

Kyong, S.R., Szogi, A.A., Moor, P., Millner, P. (2017). Ammonia and Nitrous Oxide Emissions from Broiler Houses with Downtime Windrowed Litter. Journal of Environmental Quality., 46(3),  498-504. https://doi.org/ 10.2134/jeq2016.09.0368

Lopes, M., Leite, F.L., Valente, B.S., Heres, T., Dai Prá, M.A., Xavier, E.G., Roll, V.F.B. (2015). An assessment of the effectiveness of four in-house treatments to reduce the bacterial levels in poultry litter. Poultry Science,  94(9), 2094–2098. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pev195

Merino, R. (2018). Litter reuse reduces Eimeria spp oocyst counts and improves the performance  in broiler chickens reared in a tropical zone in Ecuador. Archiv fur Geflugelkunde. https://doi: 10.1399/eps.2018.220

Nagaraj, M., Wilson, C.A.P., Saenmahayak, B., Hess, J.B., Bilgili, S.F. (2007). Efficacy of a litter amendment to reduce pododermatitis in broiler chickens. J. Appl Poult. Res.,16(2),255-261. https://doi.org/10.1093/japr/16.2.255

Oliveira, M., . Gonçalves, B., Pádua, G., Silva, V., Silva, D., Freitas A. (2015). Treatment of poultry litter does not improve performance or carcass lesions in broilers. Rev Colom Cienc Pecua.,28 (4), 331-338. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rccp.v28n4a0

Pepper, C.M., Dunlop, M.W. (2021). Review of litter turning during a grow-out as a litter management practice to achieve dry and friable litter in poultry production. Poultry Science, 100 (6), 101071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2021.101071

Roll, V.F.B., Dai Pra, M.A., Roll, A.P. (2011). Research on Salmonella in broiler litter reused for up to 14 consecutive flocks. Poultry Science, 90(10),  2257-2262. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2011-01583

Ryabinina, O.V., Melnik, V.O. (2022). Vdoskonalennya sposobiv reheneratsiyi pidstylky dlya povtornoho vykorystannya [Improvement of litter regeneration methods for reuse].  Visnyk ahrarnoyi nauky, 1(826),  64 – 71. https://doi.org/10.31 073/agrovisnyk202201-09 (In Ukrainian).

Schmidt, A., Davis, J.,   Purswell, J.,  Fan, Z. and Kiess, A. (2013). Spatial variability of heating profiles in windrowed poultry litter. The Journal of Applied Poultry Research. 22(2), 319-328. https://doi.org/10.3382/japr.2012-00700

Staaven, N., Leishman, E., Adams, S.M., Wood, B.J., Matauschek, A.H., Baes, C.F. (2020). housing and management of turkey flocks in canada. animals, 10(7), 1159. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10071159

Vaz, C.S.L., Voss-Rech, D., Avila, V.S., Coldebella, A., Silva, V.S. (2017). Interventions to reduce the bacterial load in recycled broiler litter. Poultry Science,  96(8),  2587–2594. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pex063

Wang, D. Biochar amendment and moisture effects on poultry litter windrow heating performance windrow heating performance. The University of Tennessee, Knoxville. 5-2019. 56 p. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes