The effect of stocking density on egg production, preservation and efficiency of using laying hens in battery cages

DOI: 10.32900/2312-8402-2020-124-123-134

Pankova Svitlana,
Ph. D, Senior Researcher,,
State Poultry Research Station NAAS

Keywords: laying hens, stocking density, cage battery, egg production, safety


The influence of different floor areas in cages on the productivity, safety and economic performance of laying hens was evaluated. The study was carried out on chickens of the Ukrainian breed Birkivska barvysta of the egg production direction, the gene pool of which is preserved in the State Poultry Research Station of NAAS. The total number of birds in the experiment was 568 laying hens.The experiment was carried out using cages with an area of 90 × 90 cm when placing in them 7, 8, 9 and 10 birds, which corresponded to a stocking density of 1157.1, 1012.5, 900 and 810 cm2 per hen. The experiment lasted 33 weeks, starting at 17 weeks of age. The weight of the birds was determined by individual weighing at the beginning and the end of the experiment. Accounting for egg production, feed costs and mortality was carried out daily, the weight of eggs was determined at the age of 30 weeks by weighing the daily harvest in the context of groups. It has been established that stocking density significantly affects the main zootechnical and economic indicators of keeping laying hens. A decrease in the cage area to 810 cm2 per hen due to an increase in the number of birds in it led to a significant decrease in egg production, final live weight and safety, as well as to a deterioration in feed conversion (P<0.05). At the same time, the change in stocking density did not have a particular effect on egg weight. The obtained results show that the optimal placement for cages of this type is the placement of 7-8 layers in them at a stocking density of 1000-1150 cm2 per hen and a feeder lengthof 11-12.5 cm.Under such conditions, due to higher egg production by 21-27 pieces, safety by 5.5-6.2% and lower feed costs for 10 eggs, by 0.46-0.56 kg from one layer received 53.5-69 UAH additional gains compared to 810 cm2 per hen with a 9 cm feeder length.Placing birds of 10 heads in a cage, although it allows increasing its number in the poultry house by 43%, as a result of an excessive reduction in the area of feeding and drinking, harms its productive and economic indicators. That is, the increase in space for the birds – is a management tool that can be used to optimize the performance of egg production, preservation and consumption of feed in laying hens.


  1. Anderson, K. E., & Adams, A. W. (1992). Effects of Rearing Density and Feeder and Waterer Spaces on the Productivity and Fearful Behavior of Layers. Poultry Science, 71(1), 53–58. Retrieved from
  2. Bogachyk, O. G. (2008). Dobrobut kurej-nesuchok pry intensyvnij systemi  utrymannya ta shlyaxy jogo pokrashhennya [Welfare of laying hens under an intensive housing system and ways to improve it]. Efektyvne ptaxivnycztvo – Effectivepoultryfarming, 12(48), 24–26 [in Ukrainian].
  3. Council Directive 1999/74/EC (1999) : Laying down minimum standards for the protection of laying hens. OfficialJournalofEuropeanCommunities, L 203, 0053–0057.
  4. Zora, V. (2015). Novitnye obladnannya dlya utrymannya kurej-nesuchok TBK DN vid TOV «VO TEXNA» [The innovative equipment for the maintenance of hens from domestic producer of TOV «VO Tekhna»]. Texnika ta energetyka– Machinery & Energetics212(2), 240–248 [In Ukrainian].
  5. Vakulenko, Yu.O. (2014). Suchasni systemy i sposoby utrymannya kurej nesuchok [Modern systems and methods of keeping laying hens]. Suchasne ptaxivnycztvo – Modern poultry, 1(134), 19–23 [іn Ukrainian].
  6. Ptaxivnyczki pidpryyemstva. Vidomchi normy texnologichnogo proektuvannya [Poultry enterprises. Departmental standards of technological design]. (2005). VNTP-APK-04-05 from 1d January 2006. Kyiv : Ministry of Agrarian Policy of Ukraine [іn Ukrainian].
  7. Sandoval, M., Miles, R. D., & Jacobs, R. D. (1991). Cage space and house temperature gradient effects on performance of White Leghorn hens. Poultry Science, 70 (1),103.
  8. Perepyolkin, N. (2014). Hygiene in a poultry factory: everything is important. Zhivotnovodstvo Rossii. 8, С. 26 [іn Russian].
  9. Liubenko, O. I., & Levchenko, I. S. (2020). The research on the impact of density and feeding scale on the behavior of chickens in a flock. Taurian Scientific Herald, 111, 199–204. Retrieved from [іn Ukrainian].
  10. Onbasilar, E. E., & Aksoy, F. T. (2005). Stress parameters and immune response of layers under different cage floor and density conditions. Livestock Production Science, 95(3), 255–263. Retrieved from j.livprodsci.2005.01.006
  11. Hofmann, T. M., Schmucker, S. S., & Stefanski, V. (2019). Stocking density during rearing affects the immune system of laying hens. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity. 81, 18–19. Retrieved from
  12. Asghar Saki, A., Zamani, P., Rahmati, M., & Mahmoudi, H. (2012). The effect of cage density on laying hen performance, egg quality, and excreta minerals. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 21(3), 467–475. Retrieved from
  13. Robinson, D. (1979). Effects of cage shape, colony size, floor area and cannibalism preventatives on laying performance. British Poultry Science, 20(4), 345–356. Retrieved from
  14. Levchenko, I. S., & Liubenko, O. I. (2020). Kanibalizm ptyci ta jogo profilaktyka [cannibalism in poultry and methods to prevent it]. Naukovi dopovidi NUBIP UkrainyKyiv, 3(85),7–12.Retrieved from [іn Ukrainian].
  15. Marino, L. (2017). Thinking chickens: a review of cognition, emotion, and behavior in the domestic chicken. Animal Cognition. 20(2), 127–147. Retrieved from
  16. Iyalabani, K. A., Oniya, O. O., Osunade, J. A., & Olaniran, J. A. (2019). Effects of floor space area in battery cages on the bird weight and egg production of olympia black layers. Innovative Systems Design and Engineering, 10(7). Retrieved from
  17. Anderson, K. E., & Jenkins, P. K. (2011). Effect of Rearing Dietary Regimen, Feeder Space and Density on Egg Production, Quality and Size Distribution in Two Strains of Brown Egg Layers. International Journal of Poultry Science, 10(3), 169–175. Retrieved from
  18. Kobzar, A. I. (2012). Prikladnaja matematicheskaja statistika. Dlja inzhenerov i nauchnyh rabotnikov [Applied Mathematical Statistics. For engineers and scientists]. Moscow : FIZMATLIT [in Russian].
  19. Sarica, M., Boga, S., & Yamak, U. S. (2008). The effects of space allowance on egg yield, egg quality and plumage condition of laying hens in battery cages. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 53(8), 345–353. Retrieved from
  20. Zehra, B., Smail, B., Smail, T. L., & Orhan, C. A. (2006). Effects of Cage Density and Cage Position on Performance of Commercial Layer Pullets from Four Genotypes. Turk J Vet Anim Sci., 30, 17–28.
  21. Akbari Moghaddam Kakhki, R, Bakhshalinejad, R, Anderson, KE & Golian, A. (2018). Effect of High and Low Stocking Density on Age of Maturity, Egg Production, Egg Size Distribution in White and Brown Layer Hens: A Meta-analysis. Poultry Science Journal,6(1), 71–87. DOI: 10.22069/psj.2018.14112.1292
  22. Anderson, K. E., Davis, G. S., Jenkins, P. K., & Carroll, A. S. (2004). Effects of Bird Age, Density, and Molt on Behavioral Profiles of Two Commercial Layer Strains in Cages. Poultry Science, 83(1), 15–23. Retrieved from
  23. Siegel, H. S. (1959). Egg Production Characteristics and Adrenal Function in White Leghorns Confined at Different Floor Space Levels. Poultry Science, 38(4), 893–898. Retrieved from