The decrease of technological losses while raising piglets during the sucking period by introducing probiotic complex drug to the rations

Download PDF

DOI: 10.32900/2312-8402-2019-121-104-110

Zhukorskiy Ostap Myroslavovych,
Doctor of Science, professor, corresponding member of NAAS,
National Academy of Agricultural Sciences of Ukraine,
Danilenko S. G.,
Doctor of Science,
Institute of Food Resources NAAS,
Chorna O. O., 
postgraduate student,
Institute of breeding and animal genetics named M.V. Zubtsa NAAS,
Semenov Sergey Alekseevich,
 PhD,
Institute of Pig Production and Agricultural Production NAAS

Keywords: pigs, piglets, probiotics, rasing, productivity

Abstract

The article presents the data on the determination of the effectiveness of using the probiotic complex preparation “TIMM-S” in the raising of newborn piglets. The aim of the research was to study the effect of a complex probiotic drug on animal growth, hematological parameters and a decrease in the technological losses of piglets in the suckig period. Scientific and economic experiment was conducted on pigs of the Poltava breed. For this purpose, 12 heads of sow sows, analogues by age and live weight were selected, and two groups were formed, control and experimental, each of which consisted of 6 pigs. Piglets, which were obtained from sows of the experimental group, were perorally given a probiotic “TIMM-C” in the form of an aqueous suspension of 5 cm3 per head. Preperate has a polycomponent composition of 4 highly active strains: Bifidobacterium infantis, B. suis, Lactobacillus acidophilus, L. plantarum. The amount of lactic acid bacteria is 1×109 CFU / cm3, bifidobacterium – 3×109 CFU / cm3.
During the experiment from control and experimental groups sows received 50 and 49 live piglets, on average 8.33 and 8.17 piglets respectively were received on the farrow. At 45 days of age, on average, from one sow, piglets were weaned in the control group of 6.5 heads, and in the experiment, 7.5 heads or 15 % more.
The number of red blood cells was higher in animals of the experimental group by 8.6 % against the background value of 5.8 million × 1012 / l, but the difference was not significant. Optimal conditions for the growth of piglets in the course of their use of the probiotic drug studied in the experimental group caused a significant increase in the hemoglobin concentration relative to the analogues in the control by 9.0 % (p≤0.001), contributed to a general increase in the content of total protein and calcium by 3 % , phosphorus is 4.7 % in serum.
Feeding the drug “TIMM-S” in the form of aqueous suspension in the amount of 5 cm3 on the head to subsyseous pigs increased: preservation by 13,8 %; significantly increased the growth of live weight and positively influenced the process of erythropoiesis, protein and mineral metabolism in the body of animals.

References

  1. Hacin, B., & Rogelj, T., Matijasic, B. B. (2008). Lactobacillus isolates from weaned piglets mucosa with inhibitory activity against common porcine pathogens. Folia Microbial, 53, 569–579.
  2. Rist, V. T. S., & Weiss, E., Eklund, M. Mosenthin, R., (2013). Impact and activity on microbiota composition and activity in the gastrointestinal tract of piglets in relation to gut health. Anim., 7, 10671078.
  3. Kiers, J. L., & Meijer, J. C., Nout, M. J. R., Rombouts, F. M., Nabuurs, M. J. A., Van der Meulen, J. (2003). Effect of fermented soybeans on diarrhea and feed efficiency in weaned piglets. J. Appl. Microbiol., 95, 545–552.
  4. Thu, T. V., & Loh, T. C., Foo, H. L., Yaakub, H., Bejo, M.H. (2011). Effect of liquid metabolite combinations produced by Lactobacillus plantarum on growth performance, feces characteristics, intestinal morphology and diarrhea incidence in post-weaning piglets. Trop. Anim. Health. Prod., 43, 69–75.
  5. Bajagai Y. S, & Klieve A. V., Dart, P. J., Bryden, W. L. (2016). Probiotics in animal nutrition – production, impact and regulation H.P.S. Makkar (Ed.), FAO animal production and health paper No. 179, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nation, Rome, Italy.
  6. Sung Yong Chang, & Shah Ahmed Belal, Da Rae Kang, Yang Il Choi, Young Hoon Kim, Ho Sung Choe, Jae Young Heo, Kawn Seob Shim (2018). Influence of Probiotics-Friendly Pig Production on Meat Quality and Physicochemical Characteristics. Korean J. Food Sci. Anim. Resour., Apr; 38(2), 403–416.
  7. Yirga, H. (2015). The use of probiotics in animal nutrition. J. Prob. Health, 3, 1-10
  8. Hemaiswarya, S., & Raja, R., Ravikumar, R., Carvalho, I. S. (2013). Mechanism of action of probiotics. Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol., 56, 113–119.
  9. Pivtorak, Y. І., & Paranyak, R. P., Blaida, І. М. (2016). Produktyvna diya kormovoi dobavky «PROPIHplv» u racionah remontnoho molodnyaku svyneiу [Productive action of the feed supplement “PROPIG PLV” in the rations of the repair young pigs]. Naukovyj visnyk L’vivs’kogo nacional’nogo universytetu veterynarnoi’ medycyny ta biotehnologij im. S. Z. Gzhyc’kogo – Scientific herald of the Lviv National University of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnology. S. Z. Gzhytsky. Lviv, 18, 1(65), 3, 133 – 139.
  10. Zhukorskyi, O. M., & Chorna, О. М. (2018). Imunostymuljuval’na dija funkcional’noi’ dobavky «BK-P» na organizm svynej [Immunostimulatory action of the functional additive “BK-P” on the organism of pigs]. Biologija tvaryn – Biology of animals., 20, 4, 154.
  11. Cho, J. H., & Zhao, P. Y., Kim, I. H. (2011). Probiotics as dietary additives for pigs: A review. J. Anim. Vet. Adv. 10, 2127–2134.
  12. Dlamini, Z. C., & Langa, R. L. S., Aiyegoro O. A., Okoh A. I. (2017). Effects of probiotics on growth performance, blood parameters, and antibody stimulation in piglets. Afr. j. anim. sci., 47, 6, 10–21