STUDY OF THE EFFICIENCY AND COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE APPLICATION OF TECHNIQUES FOR EVALUATING THE QUALITY OF PHYTOPHAGES AND ENTOMOPHAGES AT DIFFERENT STAGES OF ONTOGENESIS

DOI: 10.32900/2312-8402-2024-131-116-127

Tetiana Markina,
Doctor of Biological Sciences, professor,
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6313-9814,
Biotechnological Institute of Engineering and Technology of NAAS, Odessa, Ukraine,
Kharkiv National Pedagogical University named after H. S. Skovoroda, Ukraine,
Evgenia Golub,
PhD in Agricultural Sciences,
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3415-4193,
Engineering and Technological Institute “Biotekhnica” of NAAS, Odessa, Ukraine,
Olga Panchenko,
PhD in candidate of agricultural sciences,
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9580-2839,
Livestock Farming Institute of NAAS, Kharkiv, Ukraine

Keywords: industrial entomology, crop quality control, entomophages, phytophages, biomaterial, viability, taxis, insect mother cultures, gene pool, stages of ontogenesis.


The concept of quality control of insect crops is proposed, which is based on a targeted approach based on the goal and objectives of the implementation of a certain breeding program and is divided into two main directions: control of phytophage production, control of entomophage production. Quality control methods are based on the general biological rule of dependence between the intensity of insect taxis and the overall viability of biomaterial. The effectiveness of methods for assessing the quality of phytophages (on the example of the mother cultures of the grain moth Sitotroga cerealella, the wax moth Galleria mellonella) and entomophages (laboratory and natural populations of P. bioculatus.) of the Center for Mother Cultures of Insects Engineering and Technological Institute “Biotekhnica” of the National Academy of Sciences (ETI “Biotekhnica”) at different stages of ontogenesis was investigated using the indicator the intensity of taxis.

As a result of research conducted on the culture of phytophagous, grain moth, a significant difference with the control was established in the indicators of viability of eggs, larvae, pupae and adults: 25; 6; 33 and 11%, respectively. Studies conducted with another phytophagous representative – the wax firefly – also showed positive results (16; 17; 16; 11%, respectively). The obtained (as a result of preliminary quality control) and selection culture had significantly higher viability indicators at all stages of ontogenesis.

It was established that the intensity of chemotaxis of larvae of the 1st age of entomophages directly correlates with the indicator of viability of the insect culture. When selecting the starting material for successful culture, it is possible to select by chemotaxis of the larvae after rebirth from the egg. Thus, viability when selecting for Colorado beetle eggs significantly (p<0.01) exceeds this indicator in other selection options – Colorado beetle larvae and wax firefly larvae: 82; 59; 73% respectively. When working with an artificial population of P. bioculatus, on wax moth larvae, the highest intensity of taxis was noted in the variant with wax moth larvae compared to Colorado beetle eggs and Colorado beetle larvae – 37; 34; 29% respectively. This indicates a shift in the number of the population in the direction of individuals that successfully feed on unnatural food. Their viability was significantly higher than the viability in other variants of the study with an artificial population – 78; 71; 68% respectively. The proposed method of selection of starting material for cultivation of P. bioculatus allows differentiation of individuals for further effective reproduction, and the use of such biomaterial in programs of biological protection of plants from pests.

A comparative analysis of methods for assessing the quality of phytophagous and entomophagous cultures at different stages of ontogenesis was carried out using the indicator of the overall viability of insect populations. It is an integrated indicator that takes into account the viability of the population at all stages of its development. All tested objects of the study showed that control and improvement of culture quality by the proposed method lead to an increase in the viability of biomaterial by 18.71; 18.56 and 8.86%, respectively (egg, larva, pupa).

 

References

Barkar, V. P., Markina, T.  Yu., & Molchanova, O. D. (2020). Biolohichni pokaznyky koktsynelid yak kryterii yakosti biomaterialu pry kultyvuvanni Coccinella Septempunctata L. (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) [Biological indicators of coccinellids as a criterion for the quality of biomaterial in the cultivation of Coccinella Septempunctata L. (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae)] Bioriznomanittia, ekolohiia ta eksperymentalna biolohiia – Biodiversity, ecology and experimental biology, 22 (1). (in Ukrainian). https://doi.org/10.34142/2708-5848.2020.22.1.04

Chepurnaya, N. P. (1995). Biologicheskiye osnovy kontrolya kachestva kul’tur nasekomykh [Biological bases of quality control of insect cultures] (Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis) Kyiv, 26. (in Ukrainian).

Chernova, I. S. (2022). Perspektyvni napryamy shchodo rozrobky ekspres-metodiv kontrolyu yakosti kulʹtur komakh. [Prospective directions for the development of express methods of quality control of insect cultures]. Biological method of plant protection: achievements and prospects: materials of the international. of science conf. (Odesa, October 4-5, 2022) Information bulletin of ITI “Biotechnique” of the National Academy of Sciences. 1. 54-56. Available at:  https://biotekhnika.od.ua/uk/diialnist/publikatsii/189-materialy-mizhnar-naukkonf-odesa-4-5-zhovtnia-2022-r (in Ukrainian).

Chernova, I. S., & Lysenko, V. P. (2018). Do pytannya kontrolyu yakosti entomofahiv v tekhnotsenozi. [To the issue of quality control of entomophages in technocenosis] Biological method of plant protection: achievements and prospects: materials of the international. science – practice conf. (Odesa, October 1-5, 2018). Odesa, 341-346. (in Ukrainian).

Ghimire, M. N., & Phillips, T. W. (2014). Oviposition and Reproductive Performance of Habrobracon hebetor (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) on Six Different Pyralid Host Species. Annals of the Entomological Society of America. 107, 4. 809-817.

Klimpinya, A. Ye., & Mikhnevich, O. Ch. (1986). Nekotoryye pokazateli gemolimfy i gonad dlya otsenki kachestva razvodimykh nasekomykh [Some indices of hemolymph and gonads for assessing the quality of bred insects] Abstracts of reports of the 1st All-Union Conference on Industrial Breeding of Insects. M: MSU, 13-14. (in Russian).

Lyashenko, Yu. V. (2001). Rozrobka sposobu doboru vysokozhyttyezdatnoho materialu v selektsiyniy roboti z shovkovychnym shovkopryadom [Development of a method of selection of highly viable material in selection work with silkworm] (Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis) Chubynske, Kyiv. region, 19 (in Ukrainian).

Lysenko, V. P., & Chernova, I. S. (2018). Naukovi osnovy kontrolyuvannya yakosti entomolohichnoyi produktsiyi [Scientific bases of quality control of entomological products]. 1st Congress of the Ukrainian Entomological Society: theses addendum. (Kharkiv, August 20–23, 2018). H.: FOP Brovin O.V., 66-67. (in Ukrainian).

Markina T., Lykova I. , Holub Ye. (2024). Express methods of quality control of insect cultures – biological plant protection agents. Herald of Agrarian Science., № 1 (850). С. 48-55. https://doi.org/10.31073/agrovisnyk202301-06

Markina T. Yu., Zlotin A. Z. (2010). Intensivnost’ proyavleniya taksisov i zhiznesposobnost’ nasekomykh: obshchebiologicheskiye zakonomernosti [Intensity of manifestation of taxis and viability of insects: general biological patterns] Izvestiya Khar’kovskogo entomologicheskogo obshchestva – News of the Kharkov Entomological Society.   XVIII, 2. 66–71. (in Russian).

Markina T.Yu. (2016). Novyye podkhody k kontrolyu kachestva kul’tur nasekomykh pri razvedenii [New approaches to quality control of insect cultures during breeding] Visnyk Dnipropetrovsʹkoho universytetu. Biolohiya, ekolohiya – Bulletin of Dnipropetrovsk University. Biology, ecology. 24, 1. 164–172. (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.15421/011620

Markina, T. Yu. (2019). Gomeostaticheskiye svoystva iskusstvennykh populyatsiy nasekomykh i sposoby upravleniya ikh sostoyaniyem [Homeostatic properties of artificial populations of insects and methods of controlling their condition] monograph. Kharkov: Planeta-Print, 2019. 380 p. (in Russian).

Matushkina, N. O. (2020). Entomolohiya: kurs lektsiy [Entomology: a course of lectures]. Kyiv, 111. Available at: https://biomed.knu.ua/institute-activity/educational/kafedry/kafedra-ecology-and-zoology/biblioteka/2177-entomologiya-kurs-lektsij.html (in Ukrainian).

Molchanova, O. D., & Kopko I. A. (2014). Rozvedennya mlynovoyi vohnivky dlya vyroshchuvannya ektoparazytu brakon (Habrobracon hebetor Say.). [Cultivation of mill firewood for the cultivation of ectoparasite bracon (Habrobracon hebetor Say.)]. Ahrarnyy visnyk Pivdnya – Agrarian Herald of the South. 1. 131–134. (in Ukrainian).

Pristavko, V. P. (1986). Chuvstvitel’nost’ obonyaniya kak kriteriy zhiznesposobnosti kul’tur nasekomykh [Olfactory sensitivity as a criterion for the viability of insect cultures]. Abstract of the report of the 1st All-Union Conference on Problems of Zooculture. Part III. M.  240-241. (in Russian).

Safonova T. V. (2002). Vdoskonalennya metodiv otsinky hibrydiv shovkovychnoho shovkopryada v umovakh Ukrayiny [Improvement of methods of evaluation of mulberry silkworm hybrids in the conditions of Ukraine] (Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis) Kharkiv. 20 (in Ukrainian).

Stefanovska, T., Kava, L., Pidlisnyuk, V., & Tomchak, A. (2014). Tekhnolohiya vyroshchuvannya i vykorystannya orhanizmiv u biolohichnomu zakhysti roslyn: navch. posib. [Technology of cultivation and use of organisms in biological protection of plants: training. Manual] Kyiv: Agroosvita, 254. (in Ukrainian).

Zlotin, A. Z. (1989). Tekhnicheskaya entomologiya [Technical Entomology] Kiev: Naukova Dumka 183 (in Russian).

Zlotin, A. Z., & Chepurnaya N. P. (1994). Obshchiye printsipy kontrolya kachestva kul’tur nasekomykh [General principles of quality control of insect cultures] Entomologicheskoye obozreniye –  Entomological review. 73, 1. 195–199. (in Russian).