Justification of candidate polymorphisms usage in marker-assisted selection of ukrainian meaty pig breed

DOI: 10.32900/2312-8402-2020-123-149-157

Rossokha Vladimir,
Ph.D., Senior Researcher,
Oliinychenko Yelyzaveta,
Boyko Yelena,
Ph.D., Senior Researcher,
Zaderikhina Elena,
Institute of Animal Science NAAS of Ukraine

Keywords: marker selection, polymorphisms, RYR1, CTSF, CTSD, Ukrainian Meaty pig breed


Effective selection in pig breeding is not possible without involvement of new approaches which involve the assessment animal genotypes at the DNA level. The development of methods for determining the polymorphisms in candidate genes that are responsible for the manifestation of economic traits is the basis of modern marker selection technology (MAS). Currently, a number of DNA markers have been developed for use in the breeding of farm animals. In this case, the most informative were single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of genes. However, despite the significant amount of scientific research, the problem of development and implementation of DNA markers for breeds of Ukrainian selection remains relevant.
The results of SNPs study of RYR1, CTSF and CTSD genes by PCR-RFLP method are presented. The initial stage for implementing marker selection for single nucleotide polymorphisms is conducting genetic-population analysis in the studied population of Ukrainian Meaty pig breed. It was found that SNP RYR1 g. 1843 C>T was characterized by low polymorphism, the minor allele g. 1843 T met with a frequency of q = 0.05. SNP CTSD g. 70 G>A had a low level of representativeness, allele g. 70 A prevailed at a frequency of q = 0.92. It was found that SNP CTSF g. 22 G>C was characterized by a sufficient level of representativeness, both alleles were detected with a predominance of the allele frequency g. 22 G (q=0.80).
In the population of Ukrainian Meaty pig breed, there was a statistically confirmed deviation of genotype frequencies from SNP-balanced CTSF g. 22 G> C (χ2 = 28.125) and CTSD g. 70 G> A (χ2 = 26,518). In the future, SNPs of CTSF, CTSD genes can be used for associative studies to find a link between markers and signs of pig productivity and the introduction of marker-associated selection in the UM pig breed.


  1. Wakchaure, G., Subha, P., Praveen, K., Avinash, S., & Subhash, M. (2015). Marker Assisted Selection (MAS) in Animal Breeding: a review. Journal of Drug Metabolism and Toxicology, 6, P. 1–4.
  2. Egbert, K., Bjarne, N., & Pieter, W. K. (2016). Genomic selection in commercial pig breeding. Animal Frontiers, 6(1), 15–22.
  3. de Oliveira, J., Facioni, S. L., Soares, M., Pires, V., & Barbosa, J. (2006). Associations of Leptin gene polymorphisms with production traits in pigs. Anim Breed Genet., 123(6), 37–83.
  4. Getmanceva, V., Tretyakova, O. L., & Radyuk, A. V. (2014). Vliyanie polimorfizma gena IGF–2 na otkormochnye i myasnye kachestva svinej [The influence of IGF-2 polymorphism on meat quality traits in pigs]. Sbornik nauchnyh trudov Severo–Kavkazskogo nauchno–issledovatelskogo instituta zhivotnovodstva – Collection of scientific papers of the North Caucasus Research Institute of Animal Husbandry, 1(3), 22–26 [in Russian].
  5. Hill, G. (2000). Maintenance of quantitative genetic variation in animal breeding programmes. Livestock Production Science, 63, 99–109.
  6. Ciepielewski, M., Stojek, W., Borman, A., Myślińska, D., Pałczyńska, P., & Kamyczek, M. (2016). The effects of ryanodine receptor (RYR1) mutation on natural killer cell cytotoxicity, plasma cytokines and stress hormones during acute intermittent exercise in pigs. Res Vet Sci., 105, 77–86.
  7. Gladij, V. (2014). Metodologiya ocinki genotipu tvarin za molekulyarno – genetichnimi markerami u tvarinnictvi Ukrayini [The methodology of genotype animal evaluation]. Kyiv : Agrarna nauka [in Ukrainian].
  8. Balackij, N., Saenko, A. M., Pina, R. N., Buslik, T. V., & Gibolenko, E. S. (2015). Geneticheskaya differenciaciya porod svinej po desyati lokusam kolichestvennyh priznakov. Citologiya i genetikaCytology and Genetics, 5, 26–37 [in Ukrainian].
  9. Chao, Z, Wang, F, Deng, CY, Wei, LM, Sun, RP, Liu, HL, Liu, QW, & Zheng, XL (2012). Distribution and linkage disequilibrium analysis of polymorphisms of MC4R, LEP, H-FABP genes in the different populations of pigs, associated with economic traits in DIV2 line. Molecular biology reports, 39(5), 6329–
  10. Akkari,, Gocheva, V., Quick, M., Kester, J., Spencer, A., Garfall, A., Bowman, R., & Joyce, J. (2016). Combined deletion of cathepsin protease family members reveals compensatory mechanisms in cancer. Genes Dev., 30, 220–232.
  11. Brix,, Dunkhorst, A., Mayer, K., Jordans, S. (2008). Cysteine cathepsins: Cellular roadmap to different Functions. Biochimie, 90 (2), 194 – 207.
  12. Russo,, Davoli, R., Nanni, C. L., Fontanesi, L., Baiocco, C., Buttazzoni, L., Galli, S., & Virgili, R. (1998). Association of the CTSB, CTSF and CSTB genes with growth, carcass and meat quality traits in heavy pigs. Italian journal of Animal Science, 2, 67–69.
  13. Transcript : CTSD–201 (2020). E!Ensembl.  https://www.ensembl.org/Sus_scrofa/Transcript/Exons?db=core;g=ENSSSCG00000040793;r=2:1188549-1197635;t=ENSSSCT00000052185.
  14. Birta, G. , & Burgu, Yu. G. (2011). Ukrayinska m’yasna poroda [Ukrainian meat breed]. Tovaroznavstvo m’yasaCommodity of meat. Kyiv : Centr uchbovoyi literaturi.
  15. Walsh, S., Metzger, D. A., & Higuchi, R. (1991). Chelex 100 as a Medium for Extraction of DNA for PCR-Based Typing from Forensic Material. BioTechniques, 10, 506–509.
  16. Peakall,, & Smouse, P. E. (2006). GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Molecular Ecology Notes, 6, 288–295.
  17. PIC calculator [Electronic resource]. Retrieved from : http://www.liv.ac.uk/~kempsj/pic.html (last access: 06.11.16). Title from the screen.
  18. Hedrick, (2000). Genetics of populations. 2nd ed. Boston : Jones and Bartlett Publishers.