---

In order to determine the influence of breed and breeding methods on the productive characteristics of pigs in the process of rearing and fattening, seven experimental groups were formed with animals of different genotypes and breeding directions. Three methods of pig breeding were used in the experiment: Pure breeding (intra–linear), crossbreeding between breeds and breed–linear hybridisation. It was found that the highest live weight gains were achieved by hybridisation with the terminal parental line PIC–337, while purebred breeding with specialised parental lines showed limited efficiency under industrial conditions. A comparison between large white pigs and landraces shows that the landrace has a slightly better growth potential, but the increase in live weight remains moderate. It has been proven that piglets of the PIC–337 endline, which were selected for increased growth energy, are clearly superior to the analogues of the dam breeds in all important growth indicators such as average daily growth during the suckling period and during rearing, as well as total weight at the end of rearing; they consumed more feed during rearing, and converted it more efficiently into live weight gain. At the same time, the hybrids are superior to the indigenous animals in breed–linear hybridisation for all indicators of growth intensity, especially during the rearing phase. The advantage of the hybrids over the local forms in the range of 2–13% is due to the influence of the inheritance of the terminal boar of the PIC–337 line. It was found that animals with the genotype (¼L×¼LW)½PIC–337) were more productive than similar hybrids with (¼LW×¼L)½PIC–337, suggesting that the use of landrace sows as the dam line is appropriate in the creation of hybrids with maximum realisation of the heterotic effect. Thus, the use of crossbreeding and three–line hybridisation can significantly improve piglet productivity both during the suckling period and during rearing. The hybrid animals showed the best results, confirming the effectiveness of heterosis, and the use of landrace sows as the dam line provides an additional improvement in the growth indicators of the offspring. It was found that an intermediate type of inheritance characterised hybrids (¼LW× ¼ L)½PIC–337 with 9–13% lower productivity than purebred animals PIC–337, but with better conservation. Instead, the hybrids (¼L× ¼ LW)½PIC–337) showed marked heterosis, especially in terms of growth rate, absolute growth, and conservation. It was found that the animals of the PIC–337 parental line had significant advantages in fattening in terms of growth rate, reduction in fattening time and increased feed conversion efficiency compared to the parental breeds, making them promising for commercial pork production with high animal turnover rates. Hybrids involving the PIC–337 parent line are characterised by high preservation and close to the indicators of the pure line for feed conversion, but had slightly lower growth rates and feed efficiency. These results indicate an intermediate form of inheritance of these traits, and, considering the significantly higher number of piglets in the nests of hybrid pigs, the further use of hybrids in intensive pig breeding systems is feasible, taking into account their genetic characteristics.

 

References

Amer, P. R., Ludemann, C. I., & Hermesch, S. (2014). Economic weights for maternal traits of sows, including sow longevity. Journal of Animal Science, 92(12), 5345–5357. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2014–7890

Baranovskyi, D., & Tkachuk, O. (2024). Productive characteristics of pigs of different origin. Scientific and Technical Bulletin of the Institute of Animal Science of the NAAS of Ukraine, (131), Article 2. https://lfi–naas.org.ua/en/scientific–and–technical–bulletin–of–the–animal–husbandry–institute–of–the–naas/131–en (In Ukrainian)

Bates, R. O. (2020). Terminal and rotaterminal crossbreeding systems for pork producers. Agricultural: Swine Breeding, G 2311, 1–4. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/62787896.pdf

Bergamaschi, M., Tiezzi, F., Howard, J., Huang, Y. J., Gray, K. A., Schillebeeckx, C., McNulty, N. P., & Maltecca, C. (2020). Gut microbiome composition differences among breeds impact feed efficiency in swine. Microbiome, 8(1), 110. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168–020–00888–9

Chernenko, O. M., Chernenko, O. I., Mylostyvyi, R. V., Khmeleva, O. V., Garashchenko, V. Y., Bordunova, O. G., & Dutka, V. R. (2022). The results of fattening hybrid pigs of Danish selection. Ukrainian Journal of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, 5(1), 3–7. https://doi.org/10.32718/ujvas5–1.01

Christiansen, G. M., Jensen, T., & Busch, M. E. (2014). Lav korrelation mellem tilvækst i smågrisestald og slagtesvinestald [Low correlation between growth in piglet barn and fattening in pig barns] [In Danish]. https://svineproduktion.dk/publikationer/kilder/notater/2014/1402

Clutter, A. C., Buchanan, D. S., & Luce, W. G. (2004). Evaluating breeds of swine for crossbreeding programs. Division of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Oklahoma State University, 3604, 1–4. https://shareok.org/bitstream/handle/11244/331360/oksa_ANSI–3604_2004–07.pdf

Collins, C. L., Pluske, J. R., Morrison, R. S., McDonald, T. N., Smits, R. J., Henman, D. J., Stensland, I., & Dunshea, F. R. (2017). Post–weaning and whole–of–life performance of pigs is determined by live weight at weaning and the complexity of the diet fed after weaning. Animal Nutrition, 3(4), 372–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2017.01.001

De Vos, C. J., Jansman, A. J. M., & Dekker, R. A. (2020). Genetic differences in nutrient digestibility and utilization in pigs. Animal, 14(8), 1742–1750. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731120000419

Do, D. N., Strathe, A. B., Jensen, J., Mark, T., & Kadarmideen, H. N. (2013). Genetic parameters for different measures of feed efficiency and related traits in boars of three pig breeds. Journal of Animal Science, 91, 4069–4079. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2012–

Dube, B., Mulugeta, S. D., & Dzama, K. (2013). Integrating economic parameters into genetic selection for Large White pigs. Animal, 7(8), 1231–1238. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731113000392

Dudka, E. I. (2019). Produktyvni yakosti vitchyznianykh porid svynei pry vykorystanni riznykh metodiv rozvedennia [Productive qualities of domestic pig breeds using different breeding methods]. Naukovyi visnyk “Askaniia–Nova” [Scientific Bulletin “Askania–Nova”], 145, 123–133. https://doi.org/10.33694/2617–0787–2019–1–12–123–133 (In Ukrainian)

European Union. (2010). Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2010 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes (Text with EEA relevance). http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2010/63/oj

Fediaieva, A. S. (2018). Vidhodivlia svynei pry vykorystanni riznykh henotypiv v umovakh promyslovoho vyrobnytstva [Fattening pigs using different genotypes in industrial production conditions]. Naukovo–tekhnichnyi biuleten NDTs biobezpeky ta ekolohichnoho kontroliu resursiv APK [Scientific and Technical Bulletin of the Research Center for Biosafety and Ecological Control of Agricultural and Industrial Complex Resources], 6(1), 57–60. https://bulletin–biosafety.com/index.php/journal/article/view/172 (In Ukrainian)

Genetic Update Programs. (2025).https://agrocerespic.com.br/en/?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Harmatiuk, K. V. (2022). Hospodarsko–korysni oznaky remontnoho molodniaku svynei porid Velyka bila ta Landras v umovakh hospodarstv riznykh form vlasnosti [Economically useful characteristics of replacement young pigs of the Velyka Bila and Landrace breeds in the conditions of farms of different forms of ownership]. Dissertation for the degree of Candidate of Agricultural Sciences. Odessa. https://osau.edu.ua/wp–content/uploads/2022/07/Garmatyuk–K.V.dysertatsiya.p (In Ukrainian)

Hyun, Y., Lee, S., & Kim, J. (2023). Feed intake patterns and growth performance of purebred and crossbred Meishan and Yorkshire pigs. Asian–Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 36(3), 402–410. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.22.0312

Iversen, M. W., Nordbø, Ø., Gjerlaug–Enger, E., Grindflek, E., Lopes, M. S., et al. (2019). Effects of heterozygosity on performance of purebred and crossbred pigs. Genetics Selection Evolution, 51, 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12711–019–0450–1

Jin, L., Chen, X., Li, Q., Wang, J., Huang, Y., Gong, Y., et al. (2023). Genetic analysis of maternal and paternal line effects on growth performance and feed conversion in hybrid pigs. Livestock Science, 266, 105199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2023.105199

Kasper, C., Ribeiro, D., Almeida, A. M., Larzul, C., Liaubet, L., & Murani, E. (2020). Omics application in animal science – A special emphasis on stress response and damaging behaviour in pigs. Genes, 11(8), 920. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11080920

Kim, S. W., Weaver, A. C., & Shen, Y. B. (2022). Feeding and management strategies to optimize growth performance and feed efficiency in pigs. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, 13(1), 112. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104–022–00707–7

Kremez, M., Povod, M., Mykhalko, O., Verbelchuk, T., Verbelchuk, S., Koberniuk, V., Borshchenko, V., Kalynychenko, H., & Onishenko, L. (2024). Efficiency of breeding of purebred, crossbred and hybrid piglets of the English breed. Scientific Papers Series Management, Economic Engineering in Agriculture and Rural Development, 24(4), 485–497. https://managementjournal.usamv.ro/pdf/vol.24_4/Art54.pdf

Ladyka, V. I., Khmelnychiy, L. M., & Povod, M. G. (2023). Tekhnolohiia vyrobnytstva i pererobky produktsii tvarynnytstva: pidruchnyk dlia aspirantiv [Technology of production and processing of livestock products: A textbook for graduate students]. Odesa: Oldi+. (In Ukrainian).

Lee, H., Kim, H., An, J., Cheong, H.–T., & Lee, S.–H. (2024). Comparison of development and antioxidative ability in fertilized crossbred (Yorkshire × Landrace × Duroc) oocytes using Duroc and Landrace sperm. Animals, 14(24), 3562. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14243562

Li, H., Wang, Z., Yang, X., Li, Y., & Zhang, H. (2022). Impact of genetic factors on meat quality and muscle development in pigs. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, 13(1), 42. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104–022–00673–3

Li, Q., Huang, Z., Zhao, W., Li, M., & Li, C. (2020). Transcriptome analysis reveals long intergenic non–coding RNAs contributed to intramuscular fat content differences between Yorkshire and Wei pigs. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 21(5), 1732. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21051732

Lisnyi, V. A., & Nazarenko, I. V. (2002). Pidvyshchennia efektyvnosti heterozysnoi selektsii v svynarstvi shliakhom otsinky kombinatsiinoi zdatnosti porid ta typiv svynei [Increasing the efficiency of heterosis selection in pig breeding by assessing the combining ability of breeds and types of pigs]. Visnyk ahrarnoi nauky Prychornomoria – Bulletin of the Agricultural Science of the Black Sea Region, 3, 58–66. (In Ukrainian)

Liu, S., Yao, T., Chen, D., et al. (2023). Genomic prediction in pigs using data from a commercial crossbred population: Insights from the Duroc × (Landrace × Yorkshire) three–way crossbreeding system. Genetics Selection Evolution, 55, 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12711–023–00794–2

Liu, X., Zhou, L., Xie, X., Wu, Z., Xiong, X., Zhang, Z., Yang, J., Xiao, S., Zhou, M., Ma, J., et al. (2019). Muscle glycogen level and occurrence of acid meat in commercial hybrid pigs are regulated by two low–frequency causal variants with large effects and multiple common variants with small effects. Genetics Selection Evolution, 51, 46. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12711–019–0490–6

Lykhach, V. Ya., Povod, M. G., Shpetny, M. B., Nechmilov, V. M., Lykhach, A. V., Mykhalko, O. G., Barkar, E. V., Lenkov, L. G., & Kucher, O. O. (2023). Optymizatsiia tekhnolohichnykh rishen utrymannia ta hodivli svynei v umovakh promyslovoi tekhnolohii [Optimization of technological solutions for keeping and feeding pigs in conditions of industrial technology: Monograph]. Mykolayiv: Ilion. (In Ukrainian).

Macbeth, W. G., & Smith, J. A. (1986). Comparative performance of purebred and crossbred Large White and Landrace pigs. Queensland Journal of Agricultural and Animal Sciences, 43(1), 47–54. https://era.dpi.qld.gov.au/id/eprint/12039/1/QJAAS_43%5B1%5D_1986_pp47–54_macbeth.pdf

Maribo, H., Nielsen, B., & Nielsen, M. F. (2018). Slagtesvin af DanBred Duroc vokser hurtigere end German Pietrain–krydsninger [Slaughter pigs of DanBred Duroc grow faster than German Pietrain crossbreeds]. Meddelelse nr. 1154. Seges Svineproduktion. https://svineproduktion.dk/publikationer/kilder/lu_medd/2018/1154

Nielsen, B., & Velander, I. H. (2018). Produktionsresultater hos D(LY)–krydsninger og Duroc [Production results of D(LY) crosses and Duroc]. Videncenter for Svineproduktion – Knowledge Center for Pig Production. [In Danish] https://svineproduktion.dk/publikationer/kilder/lu_medd/2016/1093

Nielsen, T., & Larsen, S. (2018). Comparative investigations on feeding efficiency in growing and fattening DanBred and Topigs hybrid pigs. Animal Science Research, 12(4), 198–205. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/325988473_Comparative_investigations_on_feeding_efficiency_in_growing_and_fattening_DanBred_and_Topigs_hybrid_pigs

PIC Genetics. (2023). Terminal boar portfolio. https://www.pic.com

Pig Progress. (2023). PIC continues genetic improvement across key traits. https://www.pigprogress.net

Povod, M., Bondarska, O., Lykhach, V., Zhyzhka, S., Nechmilov, V., & Mykhalko, O. (2021). Tekhnolohiia vyrobnytstva produktsii svynarstva [Technology of pig production]. Kyiv: Naukovo–metodychnyi tsentr VFPO [Scientific and Methodological Center of VFPO]. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357281420_TEHNOLOGIA_VIROBNICTVA_I_PEREROBKI_PRODUKCII_SVINARSTVA_DEMO

Roth, K., Pröll–Cornelissen, M. J., Heuß, E. M., Dauben, C. M., Henne, H., Appel, A. K., Schellander, K., Tholen, E., & Große–Brinkhaus, C. (2022). Genetic parameters of immune traits for Landrace and Large White pig breeds. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 139(6), 695–709. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbg.12735

Santiago, G., López, B. I., Tor, M., Estany, J., & Ramírez, O. (2021). Estimation of genetic parameters for feeding pattern traits and its relationship to feed efficiency and production traits in Duroc pigs. Agriculture, 11(9), 850. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11090850

Schroyen, M., & Tuggle, C. K. (2015). Current transcriptomics in pig immunity research. Mammalian Genome, 26(1–2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00335–014–9549–4

Shuplik, V., & Shcherbatiuk, N. (2024). Otsinka vidghodivelnykh yakostei svynei riznykh henotypiv [Evaluation of fattening qualities of pigs of different genotypes]. Naukovyi zbirnyk «InterConf» – Scientific Collection “InterConf”, 203, 277–283. https://archive.interconf.center/index.php/conference–proceeding/article/view/6420

Smith, W. C., Pearson, G., & Purchas, R. W. (1990). A comparison of the Duroc, Hampshire, Landrace, and Large White as terminal sire breeds of crossbred pigs slaughtered at 85 kg liveweight. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research, 33(1), 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/00288233.1990.10430870

Sørensen, M. K., Norberg, E., Pedersen, J., & Christensen, L. G. (2008). Invited review: Crossbreeding in dairy cattle: A Danish perspective. Journal of Dairy Science, 91(10), 4116–4128. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2008–1273

Šprysl, M., Stupka, R., & Čítek, J. (2005). Genotype impact on the economy of production performance in pigs. Agricultural Economics – Czech, 51(3), 123–133. https://www.agriculturejournals.cz/pdfs/age/2005/03/04.pdf

Strathe, A. B., Danfaer, A., Sørensen, H., & Kebreab, E. (2010). A multilevel nonlinear mixed–effects approach to model growth in pigs. Journal of Animal Science, 88(2), 638–649. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2008–1424

Tatsii, O. (2021). Produktyvnist svynei porody pietren za vykorystannia riznykh metodiv rozvedennia [Productivity of Pietren pigs using different breeding methods]. Ahrarnyi visnyk Prychornomoria – Agrarian Bulletin of the Black Sea Region, 100. https://doi.org/10.37000/abbsl.2021.100.20 (In Ukrainian)

Topigs Norsvin. (2022). Genetics for performance. https://topigsnorsvin.com

Vashchenko, O. V. (2016). Produktyvnist’ svynei pry chystoporodnomu rozvedenni ta skhreshchuvanni [Productivity of pigs under purebred breeding and crossbreeding]. Rozvedennia i henetyka tvaryn, 51, 34–41. https://digest.iabg.org.ua/selection/item/download/780_2a1ccc95b825474830af831139c5ce90 (In Ukrainian)

Vashchenko, O. V. (2017). Ekonomichna efektyvnist vykorystannia heterozysu za promyslovoho skhreshchuvanni svynei [Economic efficiency of using heterosis in industrial crossbreeding of pigs]. Tekhnolohiia vyrobnytstva ta pererobky produktsii tvarynnytstva – Technology of production and processing of livestock products, 134, 32–37. http://iabg.org.ua/images/aspirantura/dis.vaschenko2.pdf (In Ukrainian)

Voloshynov, V. V., & Povod, M. H. (2024). Produktyvni yakosti ta efektyvnist vidhodivli hibrydnykh svynei danskoho ta kanadskoho pokhodzhennia v umovakh promyslovoi tekhnolohii [Productive qualities and efficiency of fattening hybrid pigs of Danish and Canadian origin under industrial technology]. Visnyk Sumskoho natsionalnoho ahrarnoho universytetu. Seriia «Tvarynnytstvo» – Bulletin of the Sumy National Agrarian University. Series “Animal Husbandry”, 1, 24–28. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/378927771_PRODUKTIVNI_AKOSTI_TA_EFEKTIVNIST_VIDGODIVLI_GIBRIDNIH_SVINEJ_DANSKOGO_TA_KANADSKOGO_POHODZENNA_V_UMOVAH_PROMISLOVOI_TEHNOLOGII (In Ukrainian)

Wientjes, Y. C. J., & Calus, M. P. L. (2017). The purebred–crossbred correlation in pigs: A review of theory, estimates, and implications. Journal of Animal Science, 95(8), 3467–3478. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2017.1669

Wu, X. L., & Zhao, S. (2021). Editorial: Advances in genomics of crossbred farm animals. Frontiers in Genetics, 12, 709483. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2021.709483

Xie, Z., Gan, M., Du, J., et al. (2023). Comparison of growth performance and plasma metabolomics between two sire breeds of pigs in China. Genes, 14(9), 1706. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14091706

Yang, C., Wu, C., Zhou, Y., Li, M., Yu, J., Wang, Z., et al. (2023). Plasma biochemical profile and performance traits in hybrids of Large White, Landrace, and Duroc pigs. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition, 107(1), 23–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.13806

Yurchenko, O. S., Bondarska, O. M., Lykhach, V. Ya., Kalitaiev, K. K., & Kovalenko, O. A. (2024). Stan vitchyznianoho svynarstva. Problemy ta perspektyvy [State of domestic pig breeding. Problems and prospects]. Podilskyi visnyk: silske hospodarstvo, tekhnika, ekonomika – Podillia Bulletin: Agriculture, Engineering, Economics, 1(42), 55–61. https://journals.pdu.khmelnitskiy.ua/index.php/podilian_bulletin/article/view/312 (In Ukrainian)

Zhou, P., Yin, C., Wang, Y., Yin, Z., & Liu, Y. (2023). Genomic association analysis of growth and backfat traits in Large White pigs. Genes, 14(6), 1258. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14061258