EFFICIENCY OF USING FARROWING CRATES EQUIPPED WITH AN ELECTRONIC FEEDER FOR LACTATING SOWS

DOI: 10.32900/3083-7987-2026-137-101-111

Anatoliy SOLOVIOV,
Postgraduate Student,
https://orcid.org/0009-0007-5274-975X,
Poltava University of Economics and Trade, Poltava, Ukraine

Keywords: modernization, crates, electronic feeding, lactating sows, suckling piglets, behavior, live weight, reproductive traits


UDC 628.86.89

Received: April 14, 2026

Revised: April 20, 2026

Published: May 29, 2026

This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license

 

The study was conducted in 2024 at the breeding reproducer of the Cherkasy Research Station of the Institute of Agriculture of the National Academy of Agrarian Sciences on lactating Large White sows. The aim was to investigate the efficiency of using farrowing crates equipped with an electronic feeder for housing lactating sows with piglets. The farrowing crate equipment for lactating sows was modernized, and their behavior and productivity parameters were studied. The distinctive feature of the modernization was that the crate-unit was equipped with a round feeder connected to an electronic feeding apparatus, and a play device was mounted on the adjacent partition. To determine the efficiency of the experimental equipment, a control group of lactating sows (n=8) was formed in one of the farm’s facilities; these sows were housed in crates with stationary farrowing crates. In the experimental group, lactating sows (n=8) were kept in experimental crates equipped with a transformable farrowing crate. Compound feed for the control group sows was delivered into standard feeders from a mechanical dispenser twice a day. Compound feed for the experimental group sows was delivered into the experimental feeders from an electronic feeding apparatus eight times a day. It was established that the improved farrowing crate equipment prevents feed wastage and improves animal welfare and productivity. The experimental group sows kept in the modernized crates outperformed their control counterparts in terms of estimated milk yield, average piglet weight, litter weight, and reproductive performance coefficient by 1.88%, 5.39%, 7.36%, and 3.17%, respectively.

References

Aparicio-Arnay M. (2025). Precision feeding for lactating sows: The path to sustainability and efficiency. https://www.pig333.com/articles/precision-feeding-for-lactating-sows_21564/.

Aparicio-Arnay M. Yeste-Vizcaíno N.,  Nerea S. et. al. (2025). Effects of Precision Feeding on Economic and Productive Yields of Hyperprolific Lactating Sows Allocated at Different Farrowing Pens. Animals. 15(5), 763. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15050763

Baxter E.M.,  Lawrence A.B.,  Edwards S.A., et.al. (2012); Alternative farrowing accommodation: welfare and economic aspects of existing farrowing and lactation systems for pigs. Animal. Vol. 6, Is. 1. P. 96-117. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731111001224.

Brown S.M., Klaffenböck M. ,  Nevison I.M. et. al. (2015). Evidence for litter differences in play behaviour in pre-weaned pigs.  Appl. Anim Behav. Sci. 172:17–25.  http:// doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2015.09.007.

Brown S.M, Peters  R.    Nevison I.M. et. al. (2018). Playful pigs: Evidence of consistency and change in play depending on litter and developmental stage. Appl. Anim Behav. Sci. P. 36-43. http:// doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2017.09.018

Cheon S. N., Jeong S. H., Yoo G. Z. et. al. (2022). Effect of alternative farrowing crates with temporary crating on the performance of lactating sows and their litters. Anim. Sci. Technol. Vol. 64(3). P. 574-587. http://doi: 10.5187/jast.2022.e36.

Gauthier R. , Largouët C. ,  Bussières D. et. al. (2022). Precision feeding of lactating sows: implementation and evaluation of a decision support system in farm conditions. J. Anim Sci.  1;100(9):skac222. http:// doi: 10.1093/jas/skac222.

Glencorse D, Plush K, Hazel S. et. al., (2019). Glencorse D., Plush K., Hazel S.et. al. (2019). Impact of Non-Confinement Accommodation on Farrowing Performance: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Farrowing Crates Versus Pens. Animals. Vol. 9. Is. 11. P.  957.  http:// doi: 10.3390/ani9110957

Gomez J., Stigar A.-H., Boumans I.-J.-M. et.al. (2021). A systematic review of validated precision animal husbandry technologies for swine production and their potential for assessing animal welfare. Prev. Vet. Sci., 8:660565. http:// doi: 10.3389/FVETS.660565.

Gorr С. S., Lieb C., Zollich  W. et. al. (2024). Ad libitum feeding systems for sows: effects on performance and welfare of sows and piglets.  Animal.; 18(3):101093. http://doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101093.

Hlukhenkyi S.L., Lykhach V.Ia., (2025). Produktyvnist svynomatok za konstruktyvnykh osoblyvostei stankovoho obladnannia v tsekhu vidtvorennia ta oporosu. [Productivity of piglets due to the design features of the machine equipment in the production and rearing plant]. Podilskyi visnyk: silske hospodarstvo, tekhnika, ekonomika. 46. 32-42.  https://doi.org/10.37406/2706-9052-2025-1. (in Ukrainian)

Ivanov V.O., Voloshchuk V.M.(2019).  Nove v tekhnolohii vyrobnytstva ta pererobky produktsii tvarynnytstva: monohrafiia [New in production technology and processing of plastic products: monograph].  Poltava; TOV «Firma Tekhservis». 434 p. (in Ukrainian)

Lefebvre A.  (1999). The Importance of Feed Consumption During Lactation for Sow Performance Feeding Systems During Fattening: A Producer’s Question. https://jygatech.com/blogs/news/the-importance-of-feed-intake-in-lactation-on-sow-productivity.

Lohmeier R.Y, . Gimberg-Henrici C.G.E,,Burfeind O. et.al. (2019). Suckling behaviour and health parameters of sows and piglets in free-farrowing pens. Applied Animal Behaviour Scienc. Vol. 211 P. 25-32. https:// doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2018.12.006

Morales J., Rodríguez M. et. al. (2019). Big (pig) data and the internet of the swine things: a new paradigm in the industry Open Access. Animal Frontiers, Vol. 9, Is. 2, , P. 6–15. https://doi.org/10.1093/af/vfz002.

Mykhalko O.H., Povod M.H. (2019) Richna dynamika zalezhnosti produktyvnosti svynomatok vid konstruktyvnykh osoblyvostei stankiv dlia oporosu v umovakh promyslovoho kompleksu [Annual dynamics of the dependence of sow productivity on the design features of farrowing machines in industrial conditions.]. Visnyk ahrarnoi nauky Prychornomoria. Vyp.  4.  http:// doi: 10.31521/2313-092X/2019-4(104)-9 . s.80-88. (in Ukrainian)

Nichols, G. E., Gourley, K. M., DeRouchey. J. (2017) “Validation of Individual Computerized Sow Feeding Systems in Lactation,” Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Reports: Vol. 3: Iss. 7. 8.  https:// doi:10.4148/2378-5977.7459

Steinerová K., Krause  A., Parker S. E. (2025). Exploring the effect of play on heart rate variability as a measure of positive emotional states in pigs Front. Vet. Sci., 28 January Sec. Anim. Behav. and Welfare. Vol. 12. doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2025.1518153.

Zasukha L.V.(2022). Suchasni tendentsii v upravlinni utrymanniam svynomatok-sysuniv [Current trends in the management of suckling sows]. Svynarstvo: mizhvid. temat. naukovyi zbirnyk. Vol. 77-78.  S. 92-105.  http:// doi 10.37143/0371-4365-2022-77-78-08. (in Ukrainian)