Diagnostic measures regarding viral diseases of bees in their modern domestic technological scheme keeping and breeding

DOI: 10.32900/2312-8402-2023-129-131-140

Maslii Iryna,
Candidate of Veterinary Medicine. Sci., Senior Researcher,
Institute of animal science of NAAS of Ukraine

Keywords: viral diseases of bees, epizootological, clinical method of research, polymerase chain reaction


Only the most prosperous apiaries in veterinary and sanitary terms are able to ensure the proper functioning of the beekeeping industry. To do this, it is necessary to carry out timely and comprehensive diagnostic production and laboratory measures in order to identify the causative agents of bee diseases and prevent their spread. One of the modern high-precision methods is the polymerase chain reaction using specific primers. This method of analysis is quite widely used in many countries of the world for the diagnosis of viral diseases of bees.
The purpose of the research is a comparative assessment of the use of two methods: epizootological examination in the field and diagnosis of viruses using PCR with specific primers for entomopathogenic viruses. As part of the experiment, 162 samples of pathological material from 17 regions of Ukraine were examined. According to the results of a three-year epizootological examination, clinical examination of families and differential diagnosis, 146 samples of pathological material were selected for PCR research.
Out of 146 samples tested by PCR, only 51 were positive, which is 34.9%. This confirms the difficulty of establishing a diagnosis of viral diseases of bees based on clinical signs. Analyzing the results obtained over the years of research, it should be noted that the lowest number of positive cases of bees affected by viral agents according to PCR results was recorded in 2015 – 9 samples (17.6%) of cases, the largest – in 2016 – 27 (52.9%). According to the determination of the specific share of each of the studied viruses, it was established that the most common in 2014 were chronic paralysis (26.7 %) and sac-like brood (46.7 %), in 2015 – sac-like brood (66.7 %), in 2016 – chronic paralysis and saccular fetus. This indicates that effective and high-quality diagnostics of viral infections, apart from the viral disease of offspring, have not yet been sufficiently developed in Ukraine.


  1. FAO. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Honey bee diseases and pests: a practical guide. Agricultural and Food Engineering Technical Report 4, Rome. (2006). 42 с. http://www.fao.org/icatalog/inter-e.htm
  2. FAO. Good beekeeping practices: Practical manual on how to identify and control the main diseases of the honeybee (Apis mellifera). TECA –Technologies and practices for small agricultural producers. (2020). https://doi.org/10.4060/ca9182en
  3. Ball, B., (1992). An introduction to viruses and techniques for their identification and characterisation CIHEAM – Options Mediterraneennes,. 69–80.
  4. Bailey, L., (1977). Two More Small RNA Viruses from Honey Bees and Further Observations on Sacbrood  and  AcuteBee-Paralysis Viruses J.  gen. ViroL., 37. 175–182.
  5. Benjeddou, M., (2001). Detection of acute bee paralysis virus and black queen cell virus from honeybees by reverse transcriptase PCR Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 67, 2384–2387.
  6. Chen, Y. P., Pettis J. S., Collins A., & Feldlaufer M. F. (2006). Prevalence and Transmission of Honeybee Viruses Applied and environmental microbiology. 72. 606-611.
  7. Evans, J. D. (2001). Genetic Evidence for Coinfection of Honey Bees by Acute Bee Paralysis and Kashmir Bee Viruses1 Journal of Invertebrate Pathology. 78. 189–193.
  8. Olivier, V. (2008). Molecular characterisation and phylogenetic analysis of Chronic bee paralysis virus, a honey bee virus Virus Res. 132(1-2) 59 – 68.
  9. Manual of diagnostic tests and vaccines for terrestrial animals (mammals, birds and bees) (2004). World organization for animal health; OIE. Retrieved from: https://opac.spc.int/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=52298&query_desc =Provider%3AOffice%20international%20des%20%C3%A2epizooties%2C
  10. Bakulov, I. А. (1979). Rukovodstvo po obshchei epyzootolohyy [Guide to general epizootology] Moskva : Kolos,. – 424 с. [in Russian].
  11. Maslij, І. G., Niemkova, S. M., Stupak, L. P., & Desiatnykova, O. V. (2013). Epizootychna sytuatsiia shchodo osnovnykh nebezpechnykh khvorob bdzhil v Ukraini [Epizootic situation regarding the main dangerous diseases of bees in Ukraine], IV Lubelska konferencja pszczelarska aktualnie problemy nowoczesnego pszczelarstwa, Pszczela Wola 8-10 lutego. 113 – 118. [in Ukrainian].
  12. Maslij, І. G. (2016). Porivnialni monitorynhovi doslidzhennia viroziv bdzhil shliakhom epizootolohichnoho obstezhennia ta biolohichnoi proby [Comparative monitoring studies of bee viruses by means of epizootological examination and biological sampling]. Veterynarna medytsyna. 102. 98–103. [in Ukrainian].
  13. Zavhorodnii, A. I., Vlizlo, V. V., Lymanska, O. Yu., & Herilovych A. P., Molekuliarno-henetychni metody diahnostyky u veterynarnii medytsyni ta biotekhnolohii: navch. Posibnyk [Molecular and genetic methods of diagnosis in veterinary medicine and biotechnology: teaching. Manual] Kyiv : ST Druk, 2014. – 285 [in Ukrainian].
  14. Kasprzak S., Grazyna Topolska (2007) Structure, classification and methods of Identification of honey bee viruses, Medycyna Weterynaryjna, 63(11):1427-1430
  15. Kasprzak, S. Topolska, Grazyna (2008) Virus infections of the honey bee Apis mellifera associated with varroosis and nosemosis, Medycyna Weterynaryjna 64 1095-1097
  16. Ribière, M., (2002) Molecular diagnosis of chronic bee paralysis virus infection, Apidologie, 33. 339-351.
  17. Tentcheva, D., (2004). Prevalence and seasonal variations of six bee viruses in Apis mellifera L. and Varroa destructor mite populations in France. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 7185–7191.
  18. Chen, Y., (2005). Detection of multiple viruses in queens of the honey bee Apis mellifera L. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology. 90. 118–121.