DOI: 10.32900/2312-8402-2025-134-150-169
Keywords: studram, genotype, prediction model, offspring, feeding level, impact strength
The article presents the results of studies that were performed on the livestock of gimmers -14 months of age of the Kharkiv intra-breed type of the precos breed. In total, 516 gimmers heads were individually registered for Origin and productivity. Among them-409 heads of offspring of 5 studrams, the breeding value of which was determined by comparing the productivity indicators of the Daughters of individual sheep with the indicators of their peers, and-with the average indicators for the herd. All offspring obtained from studrams from artificial insemination of sheep in three adjacent years were evaluated. At the same time, their cultivation took place at different levels of annual feed consumption. Statistical processing, correlation-regression, and variance analysis were performed in the SPSS-22 software environment.
Studies have shown that with an increase in feed consumption by 4-6% per year, there is a likely increase in the average live weight for the herd from 6.7 to 11.6%, – by 15.1-16.1%, wool length – by 6.4–16.0 %. (p<0.001 in all cases), but this had a different effect on the disclosure of the potential of breeding traits in the offspring of individual sheep. So, if the genotype of studram No. 1823 turned out to be stable in terms of transmitting its hereditary qualities to offspring in changing conditions of providing them with food, then the genotype of studram No. 1625 and, especially, No. 1579 turned out to be plastic. In this regard, the indicators of rank correlation (R ± mr) of their score on the quality of offspring in adjacent years significantly differed and ranged from 0.600±0.462 to 0.900±0.252. in general, the indicators of feed consumption in the cultivation of offspring had reliable positive, average correlation (r) with the live weight of 0.439, clipping and wool length, respectively, 0.487 and 0.505. it is shown that the influence of genotypes of studrams (h2 ) for live weight, woolclip and coat length in their daughters was 3.0, respectively; 4.5 and 8.3% (in all cases p < 0.001), while the influence of the annual feed consumption factor was significantly greater, 17.9; 26.4 and 26.2%, respectively. The interaction of two factors (the genotype of the Ram X feed consumption) in relation to the impact on the living mass of gimmers was significantly lower, and amounted to 2.8 %, but remained probable, p< 0.05. to predict the parameters of individual characteristics of offspring productivity, appropriate mathematical models are proposed that take into account the complex influence of the genotype of the Ram and the level of feed consumption on them.
References
Abebe A., Banarjee S., Goshmie S., Bisrat A., Abebe A., Besufikad S., Zewdie T. and Gizaw S. (2020). Selection efficiency for growth performance of Menz sheep in a community-based breeding program. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 32 (9); http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd32/9/ascha32152.html (from 25.07.2025)
Berghof T.V.L., M.Poppe, and H.A. Mulder (2019). Opportunities to improve resilience in animal breeding programs. Front. Gene. Vol. 9; https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2018.00692
Biriukova O., Polupan Yu., Melnyk Yu., Kruhliak A., Kovalenko H., Kruhliak T., Makovska N. (2024). Analitychna zapyska «Vplyv metodu otsinky pleminnoi tsinnosti buhaiv na tempy polipshennia hospodarsky korysnykh oznak molochnoi khudoby» [Analytical note “The influence of the method of assessing the breeding value of bulls on the rate of improvement of economically useful traits of dairy cattle”]. Chubynske : IRHT im. M.V. Zubtsia NAAN, 24 s. (in Ukrainian) (from 25.07.2025) file:///C:/Users/user/Downloads/Anal.Bir.2024.pdf
Colditz I.G., Hine B.C. (2016). Resilience in farm animals: Biology, management, breeding and implications for animal welfare. Anim. Prod. Sci. 56:1961–1983; https://doi.org/10.1071/an15297
Falconer D.S. (1990). Selection in different environments: effects on environmental sensitivity (reaction norm) and on mean performance. Genetical Research. 56(1):57-70; doi:10.1017/S0016672300028883
Gross N., Taylor T., Crenshaw T., Khatib H. (2020). The Intergenerational Impacts of Paternal Diet on DNA Methylationand Offspring Phenotypes in Sheep. Front. Genet. 11:597943; https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2020.597943
Instruktsiia zi shtuchnoho osimeninnia ovets i kiz, zatverdzhena nakazom Ministerstva ahrarnoi politky Ukrainy vid 13.12.2002 r № 395 [Instructions for artificial insemination of sheep and goats, approved by order of the Ministry of Agrarian Policy of Ukraine dated 13.12.2002 No. 395]. (in Ukrainian). https://ips.ligazakon.net/document/REG7426?an=1279 (from 29.07.2025)
Jong G., Bijma P. (2002). Selection and phenotypic plasticity in evolutionary biology and animal breeding. Livestock Production Science. Vol. 78, Is. 3, 195-214; https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(02)00096-9
Joshi P. (2022). Nutrition and reproduction in sheep. Food & Agribusiness Management (FABM) 3(2): 48-52; http://doi.org/10.26480/fabm.02.2022.48.52
Knap P.W. (2005). Breeding robust pigs. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 45(8) 763-773; https://doi.org/10.1071/EA05041
Kramarenko S., Luhovyi S., Balan D., Zemoglyadchuk K. (2020). The effects of breed, sire and environmental factors on the birth and weaning weight of lambs. Ukrainian Black Sea Region Agrarian Science, 24(4), 70-78; http://doi.org/10.31521/2313-092X/2020-4(108)-9
Mallick P.K., Pourouchottamane R., Rajapandi S., Thirumaran S. M. K., Venkataraman R., Nagarajan G., Rajendiran A. S. (2017). Influence of genetic and non – genetic factors on growth traits of Bharat Merino sheep in sub-temperate climate of Kodai hills of Tamil Nadu, India. Indian Journal of Animal Research, 51(2), 365-370; https://doi.org/10.18805/ijar.10979
Mc Laren A., Brotherstone S., Lambe N.R., Conington J., Mrode R., Bunger L. (2015).The effects of different farm environments on the performance of Texel sheep, Animal, Vol. 9, Is. 10: 1624-1634; https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731115001123
Nel C. L., Werf J. H. J., Rauw W. R., Cloete S. W. P. (2023). Challenges and strategies for genetic selection of sheep better adapted to harsh environments, Animal Frontiers, Vol. 13, Is. 5: 43–52; https://doi.org/10.1093/af/vfad055
Rather M.A., Shanaz S., Ganai N.A., Hamadani A., Alam S., Khan N.N., Baba A., Raja T.A., and Bukhari S.(2020). Genetic and non-genetic factors affecting growth and reproduction traits in Kashmir Merino sheep. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences 90 (6): 950–953; https://doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v90i6.105014
Rauw W.M., and Gomez-Raya L. (2015). Genotype by environment interaction and breeding for robustness in livestock. Front. Genet. 6.: 1-15; https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2015.00310
Santos-Silva J., Mendes I.A, Bessa R.J.B (2002). The effect of genotype, feeding system and slaughter weight on the quality of light lambs: 1. Growth, carcass composition and meat quality. Livestock Production Science, Vol. 76, Is. 1–2: 17-25; https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(01)00334-7
Tillquist N.M., Kawaida M.Y., Reiter A.S., Bassani V.V., Bosco J.M., Bettencourt A.B., Gifford R.J., Engle T.E., Zinn S.A., Govoni K.E., Reed S.A. (2025).Effects of restricted- and over-feeding during gestation on colostrum and milk composition and offspring circulating immunoglobulin G concentrations in multiple generations of sheep. Small Ruminant Research. Vol. 243, 107423; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2024.107423.
Tillquist N.M., Reed S.A., Reiter A.S., Kawaida M.Y., Lee E.C., Zinn S.A., Govoni K. E. (2024). Effects of poor maternal diet during gestation are detected in F2 offspring. Translational Animal Science, Vol. 8, txae055; https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txae055
Tortereau F., Marie-Etancelin C., Weisbecker J.-L., Marcon D., Bouvier F., Moreno-Romieux C., François D. (2020). Genetic parameters for feed efficiency in Romane rams and responses to single-generation selection. Animal, Vol. 14, Is. 4, 681-687; https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731119002544
Trapina I., Kairisa D. and Paramonova N. (2023). Comparison of sire rams of the Latvian Dark-Head breed according to feed efficiency indicators as the beginning of genomic breeding research. Agronomy Research, 21(S2), 598–610; https://doi.org/10.15159/AR.23.030
Vashchenko P. A., Zhukorskyi O. M., Saenko A. M., Khokhlov A. M., Usenko S. O., Krykhyna N. V., Sukhno T. V., Tsereniuk O. M. (2023). The influence of feeding level on the growth of pigs depending on their genotype. Regulatory Mechanisms in Biosystems, 14 (1), 112–117; https://doi.org/10.15421/022317
Vdovychenko Yu.V., Kudryk N.A., Polska P.I. et al. (2018). Metodolohiia otsinky pleminnoi tsinnosti ta henetychnykh zmin v populiatsii ovets riznykh napriamiv produktyvnosti [Methodology for assessing breeding value and genetic changes in sheep populations of different productivity areas]. Nova Kakhovka: PIEL: 79 s. (in Ukrainian).
Wang W., Zhang X., Wei H., Wang S., Ye Y., He L., Zhang K., Lu Y., Zhang Z. and Huang Y. (2024). Effects of Feeding Systems on the Growth Performance, Carcass Characteristics, and Meat Quality in Sheep: Meta-Analysis. Animals, 14(18), 2738; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14182738